Photo: Sue Ann Ingles, Dr.P.H., and Glovioell W. Rowland, Ph.D.
A study led by
USC epidemiologists suggests that a high intake of calcium causes prostate
cancer among African-American men who are genetically good absorbers of
the mineral.
“High dietary intake of calcium has long been linked to prostate cancer
and this study suggests that these associations are likely to be
causal,” said
Sue
Ann Ingles, Dr.P.H., associate professor of preventive medicine at
the
Keck School of Medicine of USC
and principal investigator of the study. “At this point, however, we’re
not in a position to make any public health recommendations.”
Ingles and colleagues at
Wake
Forest Baptist Medical Center and the
Cancer
Prevention Institute of California
studied 783 African-American men living in the San Francisco and Los
Angeles areas, 533 of whom were diagnosed with prostate cancer. They
studied the effects of genotype, calcium intake and diet-gene
interactions.
The study is one of the few to explore genes related to calcium
absorption or to examine diet in a large African-American population.
Although prostate cancer is 36 percent more common among
African-Americans than in non-Hispanic whites, data on the diet-cancer
link primarily comes from Caucasian populations. The team targeted a
genetic allele that is more common in populations of African origin
than in other populations and which is associated with regulating the
absorption of calcium.
In the United States, more than 240,000 men are diagnosed annually with
prostate cancer and about 33,720 die from the disease, according to the
National Cancer
Institute. Only lung cancer kills more American men. According to
the
Prostate
Cancer Foundation,
there are no proven strategies for preventing the disease, but changes
in diet and lifestyle have shown to reduce the risk of disease
progression.
The paper, published online by the
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
in September, found that men who reported the highest intake of calcium
were two times more likely to have localized and advanced prostate
cancer than those who reported the lowest. Men with a genotype
associated with poor calcium absorption were 59 percent less likely to
have been diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer than men who
genetically were the best absorbers of calcium. And, among men with
calcium intake below the median, genetically poor absorbers had a 50
percent decreased risk of having advanced prostate cancer than the best
absorbers.
The results pose somewhat of a “conundrum,” Ingles said. Although
calcium appears to increase risk for prostate cancer, it is essential
for bone health and appears to protect against colorectal cancer, she
said.
But African-Americans generally have strong and healthy bones and
regular screening can help catch colorectal cancer, said first author
Glovioell W. Rowland, Ph.D., a post-doctoral fellow in the Keck
School’s
Department
of Preventive Medicine.
“It may be possible in the future to personalize treatment by
genotype,” Rowland said. “But, first, our results have to be confirmed
by studies of different races to indicate whether it’s the allele that
causes the disease or something else that’s highly associated with
African-American men.”
Co-author
Gary G.
Schwartz, Ph.D.,
associate professor of cancer biology and epidemiology and prevention
at Wake Forest Baptist, said the findings provide some clarity about
the link between calcium and prostate cancer. Unlike age and race,
which are fixed risk factors for prostate cancer, diet is modifiable.
“We now have a better understanding of why calcium in diet may increase
the risk for prostate cancer and who is at increased risk,” Schwartz
said. “If our results are confirmed, it gives much better insight into
the preventable causes of prostate cancer. So if I know I’m a good
absorber of calcium, I may want to be careful about the use of calcium
supplements.”