Raymond L. Goldsworthy
Contact
Effect of Realistic Test Conditions on Perception of Speech, Music, and Binaural Cues in Normal-Hearing Listeners Am J Audiol. 2022 Dec 29; 1-12. . View in PubMed
Audibility emphasis of low-level sounds improves consonant identification while preserving vowel identification for cochlear implant users Speech Commun. 2022 Feb; 137:52-59. . View in PubMed
Combining Place and Rate of Stimulation Improves Frequency Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users Hear Res. 2022 10; 424:108583. . View in PubMed
FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 05; 151(5):3116. . View in PubMed
Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 02; 23(1):137-150. . View in PubMed
Computer-based musical interval training program for Cochlear implant users and listeners with no known hearing loss Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:903924. . View in PubMed
Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation Front Comput Neurosci. 2022; 16:889992. . View in PubMed
Pleasantness Ratings of Musical Dyads in Cochlear Implant Users Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 28; 12(1). . View in PubMed
Supporting Equity and Inclusion of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Individuals in Professional Organizations Front Educ (Lausanne). 2021 Oct; 6. . View in PubMed
Perceptions of Vocal Performance Impairment in Singers with and without Hearing Loss J Voice. 2021 Jul 24. . View in PubMed
Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation Hear Res. 2021 09 15; 409:108319. . View in PubMed
Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination Ear Hear. 2020 Jan/Feb; 41(1):182-193. . View in PubMed
Perceptual learning of pitch provided by cochlear implant stimulation rate PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0242842. . View in PubMed
Pediatric Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Different Types of Background Noise J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 03 25; 62(3):758-767. . View in PubMed
Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 08; 19(4):467-478. . View in PubMed
Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 04; 19(2):193-209. . View in PubMed
Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 09; 142(3):1441. . View in PubMed
Community network for deaf scientists Science. 2017 04 28; 356(6336):386-387. . View in PubMed
Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec; 16(6):797-809. . View in PubMed
Two-microphone spatial filtering improves speech reception for cochlear-implant users in reverberant conditions with multiple noise sources Trends Hear. 2014 Oct 20; 18. . View in PubMed
Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Aug; 136(2):867-76. . View in PubMed
Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan; 135(1):334-41. . View in PubMed
Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. . View in PubMed
Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Dec; 116(6):3679-89. . View in PubMed
